8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

10/22/2026

Nidec Poses New-Old Test for Japanese Buyouts

Reuters Breakingviews (10/22/26) Lockett, Hudson

Nidec (TYO: 6594), Japan’s $16 billion precision-motor maker, is facing a major accounting crisis that could lead to its delisting from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, potentially creating an opportunity for private-equity investors. New CEO Michio Kaida said the company is still seeking auditor PwC’s approval for delayed financial results after recognizing about ¥1.1 trillion ($7 billion) in write-downs, including roughly ¥480 billion linked to accounting irregularities. Nidec must resolve its financial reporting issues by October 28 to avoid a forced delisting, while its shares have fallen sharply. The crisis is reminiscent of Toshiba, which following a 2015 accounting scandal became a high-profile option for hedge funds and investors including Elliott Management and Third Point. Nidec has also attracted investor interest, with Oasis Management building an almost 8% stake. Buyout firms such as Bain and KKR (NYSE: KKR) have the financial resources and restructuring expertise to pursue a takeover, but several obstacles could complicate a deal. Japanese authorities may consider some of Nidec’s more than 350 subsidiaries strategically important, while foreign investors could face resistance because of the company’s importance to Japan’s export economy. The experience of Toshiba, which ultimately went to a domestic consortium after foreign bidders faced concerns about strategic ownership, illustrates the potential difficulties. A successful Nidec transaction could therefore become an important test of Japan’s evolving corporate-governance and M&A environment.

Read the article

10/8/2026

Lululemon’s CEO Hires Head of Athleta in Management Shakeup

Financial Post (10/08/26) Meier, Lily

Lululemon (NASDAQ: LULU) is reshuffling its management team under new CEO Heidi O’Neill, marking her first major leadership move since taking the top job on Sept. 8. The company hired Maggie Gauger, former CEO of Gap’s (NYSE: GAP) Athleta brand and a former Nike colleague of O’Neill, as president and chief product officer, effective Oct. 26. Gauger will help address Lululemon’s slowing sales, increased competition, and customer complaints about product quality, as the company’s shares have fallen more than 50% this year. The management changes follow several executive departures, including the chief strategy officer, chief technology officer, and chief communications officer. Lululemon also announced that its chief brand and product activation officer, and chief supply chain officer, are leaving. Joseph Godsey, formerly of Walmart Canada, was appointed chief operating officer, while the company searches for new leaders overseeing brand, technology, and communications. Creative Director Jonathan Cheung will now report to Gauger, while the updated organizational structure no longer shows a supply chain chief reporting directly to O’Neill. The overhaul comes as O’Neill works to reorganize the company’s C-suite and strengthen its product and brand strategy. Meanwhile, Lululemon remains in a temporary truce with founder Chip Wilson, following months of tensions and an agreement to add an apparel and brand expert to its board.

Read the article

10/8/2026

Devon Sheds Eagle Ford Assets for $4.2 Billion to Deepen Permian Bet

Reuters (10/08/26) Kalia, Katha; Srivastava, Vallari

Devon Energy (DVN.N) will sell its Eagle Ford assets in South Texas to Crescent Energy (CRGY.N) for $4.2 billion, allowing Devon to streamline its portfolio and deepen its focus on the Permian Basin following its $58 billion merger with Coterra Energy. The Devon-Coterra deal helped create a large-cap producer with a top position in the Permian Basin, and activist investors had urged the board to pursue asset sales, improve capital allocation, and revamp executive pay to boost shareholder value. The assets cover about 90,000 net acres and produce roughly 68,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, representing about 4% of Devon’s total production. Devon said the sale will improve capital efficiency, support share buybacks, strengthen its balance sheet, and increase long-term shareholder value. Its shares rose 1.8%, while Crescent’s fell 4.3% after the announcement. For Crescent, the acquisition significantly expands its Eagle Ford position and is expected to generate nearly $100 million in annual synergies through operational improvements and efficiencies. The company plans to maintain roughly the same activity levels and production while reducing capital requirements. The transaction, expected to close by year-end, comes amid widespread consolidation in U.S. shale, with producers increasingly selling assets to reduce debt following more than $450 billion in deals since 2023. Analysts view the acquisition as potentially accretive for Crescent if it successfully integrates the assets, captures expected synergies, and reduces leverage, although the deal’s size could create near-term funding pressure.

Read the article

10/7/2026

SEC Warns Asset Managers Against Collaborating on Activist Campaigns

Financial Times (10/07/26) Clarfelt, Harriet; Masters, Brooke; Indap, Sujeet

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has warned major asset managers against coordinating their activities to influence corporate policy, following a probe into BlackRock (NYSE: BLK), Vanguard, and State Street’s (NYSE: STT) involvement in the 2021 campaign that replaced three ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) directors. The commission stopped short of enforcement action but said some fund managers participating in Climate Action 100+ came close to losing their status as passive investors. That distinction matters because passive managers can generally use the less burdensome Form 13G, while activist investors must file Form 13D with more detailed disclosures. The SEC’s warning could make asset managers more cautious about coordinated shareholder engagement, particularly on environmental and social issues. BlackRock and State Street declined to comment, while Vanguard did not immediately respond. Climate Action 100+ said its members have always operated within securities law and make independent voting decisions. The action is part of broader efforts under SEC Chair Paul Atkins to reduce shareholder influence over public companies, including proposals affecting proxy advisers, shareholder proposals, and reporting requirements. Critics argue that applying activist rules to large passive managers could discourage legitimate engagement without providing meaningful additional transparency. The SEC said its guidance is intended to clarify expectations before the 2027 proxy season, rather than initiate enforcement proceedings.

Read the article