4/29/2029

Shareholder Activism in Asia Drives Global Total to Record High

Nikkei Asia (04/29/29) Shikata, Masayuki

Activist shareholders had their busiest year on record in 2024, with the Asia-Pacific region making up a fifth of campaigns worldwide, pushing some companies higher in the stock market and spurring others to consider going private. The worldwide tally of activist campaigns rose by six to 258, up by half from three years earlier, according to data from financial advisory Lazard. Campaigns in the Asia-Pacific tripled over that period to 57, growing about 30% on the year. Japan accounted for more than 60% of the regional total with 37, an all-time high. Activity is picking up this year as well in the run-up to general shareholders meetings in June. South Korea saw 14 campaigns, a jump of 10 from 2023. Critics say South Korean conglomerates are often controlled by minority investors that care too little about other shareholders. Australia and Hong Kong saw increases of one activist campaign each. North America made up half the global total, down from 60% in 2022 and 85% in 2014. Europe had 62 campaigns last year. The upswing in Japan has been fueled by the push for corporate governance reform since 2013 and the Tokyo Stock Exchange's 2023 call for companies to be more mindful of their share prices. The bourse has encouraged corporations to focus less on share buybacks and dividends than on steps for long-term growth, such as capital spending and the sale of unprofitable businesses. Demands for capital allocation to improve return on investment accounted for 51% of activist activity in Japan last year, significantly higher than the five-year average of 32%. U.S.-based Dalton Investments called on Japanese snack maker Ezaki Glico (2206) to amend its articles of incorporation to allow shareholder returns to be decided by investors as well, not just the board of directors. Though the proposal was rejected, it won more than 40% support, and Glico itself put forward a similar measure that was approved at the following general shareholders meeting in March. U.K.-based Palliser Capital took a stake last year in developer Tokyo Tatemono (8804) and argued that more efficient use of its capital, such as selling a cross-held stake in peer Hulic, would boost corporate value. Activist investors are increasingly seeking to lock in unrealized gains from rising land prices, reaping quick profits from property sales that can go toward dividends. Companies in the Tokyo Stock Exchange's broad Topix index had 25.88 trillion yen ($181 billion at current rates) in unrealized gains on property holdings at the end of March 2024, up about 20% from four years earlier. After buying into Mitsui Fudosan (8801) in 2024, U.S.-based Elliott Investment Management this year took a stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development (8830) and is expected to push for the developer to sell real estate holdings. This month, Dalton sent a letter to Fuji Media Holdings (4676), parent of Fuji Television, calling for it to spin off its real estate business and replace its board of directors. Activist campaigns have sparked share price rallies at some companies. Shares of elevator maker Fujitec (6406) were up roughly 80% from March 2023, when it dismissed Takakazu Uchiyama -- a member of the founding family -- as chairman under pressure from Oasis Management. The rise in demands from activists "creates a sense of tension among management, including at companies that don't receive such proposals," said Masatoshi Kikuchi, chief equity strategist at Mizuho Securities. Previously tight cross-shareholdings are being unwound, and reasonable proposals from minority investors are more likely to garner support from foreign shareholders. Some companies are going private to shield themselves from perceived pressure. Investments by buyout funds targeting mature companies in the Asia-Pacific were the highest in three years in 2024, according to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Toyota Industries (6201) is considering going this route after facing pressure from investment funds last year to take steps such as dissolving a parent-child listing with a subsidiary and buying back more shares. Toyota Industries holds a 9% stake in Toyota Motor (7203). The automaker "may have proposed having [Toyota Industries] go private as a precautionary measure," said a source at an investment bank.

Read the article

1/8/2026

Opinion: British Business Faces a Rude Activist Awakening

Financial Times (01/08/26) Gapper, John

The Financial Times' John Gapper writes that this is not a happy new year for Jonathan Simpson-Dent, chair of Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust (EWI), which offers exposure to technology companies including Elon Musk’s SpaceX. He is the latest target of Boaz Weinstein, a U.S, investor who has accused him of tolerating “years of dire underperformance” at the FTSE 250 trust. Weinstein’s Saba Capital is nothing if not persistent. It was overwhelmingly defeated by other shareholders last year in its effort to restructure the trust’s board, but it has increased its stake to 30% and is trying again. There is an unspoken message: if you alienate him, he will not go away. Weinstein is the fiercest face of U.S. activism in his rolling campaign against sleepy trusts. But he is far from alone these days: hedge funds have been agitating for change at many UK companies, from BP (BP) to Smith & Nephew (SNN), and are increasingly powerful. They don’t always get what they want, but they are difficult to ignore. There is more to come. The UK was the top market in Europe for activists last year, including break-up campaigns at M&C Saatchi (SAA) and Smiths Group (SMGZY). Alvarez & Marsal, a consulting firm that works on corporate defenses, estimates that more than 50 UK companies are at risk of becoming targets in 2026. Activism is now part of UK corporate life and it is not enough for companies to complain about hedge fund opportunism and refuse to engage. Some activists set their sights on a quick buck — often a return of cash to investors — but more professional ones suggest ideas that are worth considering. Activists cannot simply turn up and shout. They need to persuade not only boards but other investors, since they usually have only a small stake themselves. UK companies are now used to defending themselves and will summon an array of expensive advisers and bankers to get other investors in line. Weinstein has a strategic advantage here, since trusts have thousands of small investors who mostly left boards in peace before he came along, selling shares if they were unhappy. EWI cannot have a quiet word with a few influential institutions to win the day: it needs to campaign for a high turnout in a shareholder vote this month to defeat Saba’s 30%. But so be it. Saba lost all of its attempts last year to place its nominees on boards, yet its argument that trusts were short-changing investors had an effect. Several of them took steps to reduce the discounts at which they traded and Terry Smith, the Mauritius-based fund manager who likes a fight himself, conceded that Weinstein was right about his Smithson trust. Weinstein’s mere presence now helps: the expectation that his targets will take steps to fix their valuations has become self-fulfilling. That is double-edged in EWI’s case, since the trust has performed quite well since last year’s vote, and heavily reduced its discount. He remains unhappy but he has less to be dissatisfied about. He has responded by getting personal, accusing Simpson-Dent of being “a pawn of Baillie Gifford,” the trust’s investment manager, and criticizing the sale of part of its SpaceX stake. Simpson-Dent says he acted to improve performance after becoming chair in 2024. He thinks Saba wants to seize control, while Weinstein insists his three board nominees are independent. This is free entertainment for those not involved, and illustrates activism’s impact. Everyone has their say in public, often rudely, and the shareholders then decide. Weinstein is acting for his own benefit and that of investors in Saba funds, but EWI’s 24,000 investors can also gain. You could almost call him public-spirited. An open brawl is not always needed. Investor funds such as Cevian Capital prefer to wield influence privately and avoid hostility, although it called publicly last year for UBS (UBS) to leave Switzerland. Paul Kinrade, a senior adviser at Alvarez & Marsal, says that “many more” funds are now choosing to work behind the scenes. The demands of activists should be scrutinized for short-termism and dismissed if they will damage the interests of long-term investors and the company itself. But these U.S. funds tend to be sophisticated as well as financially driven, and can shine a light on weaknesses that boards know about but have allowed to linger. The fact that UK trusts can hear Weinstein’s winged chariot hurrying near is no bad thing. My advice to EWI’s shareholders is to ignore all the noise and focus on whether he offers an advantage. Democracy won last time and will hopefully win again.

Read the article

1/8/2026

Toms Capital Investment Management Could Force Even More Change at Target

Modern Retail (01/08/26) Parton, Mitchell

The same hedge fund that pushed for change at Kellanova and Tylenol maker Kenvue (KVUE) now has its sights set on Target. New York-based Toms Capital Investment Management (TCIM) has made a significant investment in Target (TGT), the Financial Times reported Dec. 26. It’s unknown how large the stake is or what the firm wants out of Target. The firm had built a stake in Kenvue ahead of its almost $49 billion sale to Kimberly-Clark (KMB) in November and advocated for the sale of the company, according to Reuters. TCIM had also amassed a stake in food giant Kellanova and had pushed the company to pursue strategic and organizational changes before it was acquired by Mars for about $36 billion in 2024, per CNBC. Target has faced year-over-year comp sales declines for three consecutive quarters. As previously reported by Modern Retail, many saw last year as when Target betrayed the trust of shoppers and employees with its pullback of DEI initiatives. It was also the start of turnaround efforts such as a CEO change, operational changes and mass corporate layoffs. TCIM did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Target spokesperson provided a statement to Modern Retail with no specifics on what the new investment means for the company, other than that it is confident in the strategy previously outlined by incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke. “As part of our robust shareholder engagement program, we maintain a regular dialogue with the investment community,” the spokesperson said. “Target's top priority is getting back to growth, and our strategy to do so is rooted in three strategic priorities: leading with merchandising authority, providing a consistently elevated shopping experience and leveraging technology.” Investors buy stakes in public companies to push for changes that they believe will improve a company's finances, unlock some kind of additional value and, in turn, increase shareholder value. Target previously faced pressure from investor Pershing Square in 2009, led by Bill Ackman, who wanted to spin off the retailer's real estate but was rejected by shareholders, per Reuters. While TCIM's stake in Kenvue and Kellanova preceded acquisitions, that doesn't necessarily mean that will happen to Target, as well. Mike Ross, consumer markets deals leader for PwC, said activist investors can help speed up internal changes, including those that may already have been contemplated. Their demands could include management changes, specific divestitures or a board seat. “I would expect the management team to be working very closely with the board to understand what the goals of the activist investor are,” he said of any company facing activist pressure. “Activists rarely start with a strategy of: ‘Sell the company.’ They often have a specific objective in mind here.” Ross declined to comment on Target specifically. But he said that when companies consider private ownership, boards will want to show they’ve run out of options as a public company and can demonstrate greater value to shareholders through such a deal. “There are not a lot of precedent transactions for anything in the size that we’re talking about here,” he said. “They usually happen only when all other options are kind of exhausted.” The emergence of TCIM has left some in the retail industry — who were disappointed that Target chose the insider Fiddelke as its next CEO and kept current CEO Brian Cornell as chairman — optimistic that more changes could be made to revive the struggling retailer. The Accountability Board, a nonprofit activist group, has also acquired shares and urged Target to appoint an independent chairman through a shareholder proposal in October. “To us, [the TCIM stake] signals that investors are hungry for change and means our shareholder proposal likely has an even stronger chance of passing,” Matt Prescott, president of the Accountability Board, told Reuters. “This is such a dangerous crossroads for them,” said DeAnn Campbell, a store operations and experience consultant. “[Target’s] performance is on the wane, activist investors are at the gates, and they have Walmart (WMT) evolving into [serving] the type of customer they used to have.”

Read the article

1/7/2026

Matthews International Faces Another Proxy Fight with Barington Capital

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (01/07/26) Grant, Tim

Matthews International Corp. (MATW) is bracing for a proxy war with a hedge fund for the second time in less than a year. The based casket and funeral products maker confirmed that hedge fund Barington Capital, which owns about 3% of Matthews’ outstanding shares, has reignited a proxy fight to reshape the company from the top down, making good on a threat it issued after losing a boardroom battle at Matthews’ annual meeting last February. Barington is again seeking to shake up the board of directors, nominating three new directors as it presses the case that Matthews needs sharper focus, leaner operations, and a stronger balance sheet. The company has not yet set a date for its annual meeting this year, which is when shareholders will once again vote on the future of one of Pittsburgh’s oldest continuously operating companies. For more than a decade, Matthews has endeavored to reinvent itself as something far more than a company known for burying and memorializing the dead. Through a series of acquisitions and investments, it pushed into everything from warehouse automation to brand solutions and advanced manufacturing technologies. In a 2025 interview with the Post-Gazette, Matthews CEO Joseph Bartolacci said he believes the takeover attempt was driven, in part, by the company’s complexity, which leaves an opening for critics who don’t fully grasp the long-term strategy. However, with the company under sustained pressure from Barington, Matthews has softened that stance, saying the board and management “have rigorously evaluated the company’s portfolio of businesses, thoughtfully considered shareholder feedback and decisively acted to enhance shareholder value,” according to a Dec. 7 statement. In recent months, Matthews has moved to execute two of the strategies Barington has been pushing, striking deals to sell its warehouse automation business for $230 million and its SGK Brand Solutions business for $350 million. The SGK merger 10 years ago was so big it doubled the size of Matthews International and shifted the weight of the company’s revenue heavily towards the brand solutions side rather than its bread-and-butter funeral and memorialization products. The sale of both the warehouse automation and SGK divisions are expected to generate significant cash, much of it earmarked for debt reduction. “The ongoing strategic review has already simplified the company business mix and strengthened our balance sheet,” the company said in a statement. The sale of the two business segments underscores a renewed focus on the company’s core identity — memorialization — while freeing up capital and management attention to pursue high growth areas that include energy storage solutions, a fast-growing market where Matthews sees long-term opportunity; and its Product Identification business, which traces back to the company’s industrial roots. Matthews reported higher year-over-year revenue in its memorialization segment — which includes casket and tombstone sales — reinforcing management’s argument that the company’s foundation remains solid even as it explore new growth industries. While Matthews’ expansion into new industries has created opportunities, it’s opened the company to serious challenges too. Matthews' push into advanced manufacturing and energy technology drew the company into a $1 billion lawsuit from Tesla (TSLA), which claimed Matthews stole trade secrets tied to battery technology. “Matthews has already successfully prevailed in numerous rulings against Tesla,” the company said. “We believe that this litigation is evidence of how valuable Matthews’ proprietary technology is.” The hedge fund also has pushed for changes at other iconic brands, such as Victoria’s Secrets (VSCO) and Macy’s (M).

Read the article

1/6/2026

US Activist Investors Target UK Companies at Record Levels in 2025

Investment Week (01/06/26) Nelson, Michael

The UK retained its place as the most targeted country in Europe for activist investors, with companies facing record levels of U.S. activist pressure in 2025. According to Alvarez & Marsal's (A&M) latest A&M Activist Alert Outlook, 41% of all public activist campaigns in the UK were launched by U.S. funds – a record – while 31% of all activist campaigns initiated in Europe also targeted UK companies. However, the 39 activist cases launched in Europe engaging UK firms last year marked a drop from the 50 that took place in 2024. Activists chose not to interfere as much with company management teams, instead preferring to launch campaigns based on operational underperformance and use of capital, which represented 23% and 20% of demands, respectively, up from 20% and 19% in 2024, the report found. ESG-focused campaigns also increased in 2025, representing 14% of campaigns, up from 9% the year prior. Strong shareholder rights and perceived low valuations have also been driving further interest, the firm noted. "Even in volatile times, investors expect companies to adapt and outperform after the initial shock subsides," said André Medeiros, managing director and co-head of consumer and retail, EMEA, at A&M. "Boards only have a short window to set out their stall before investor scrutiny and challenges return." Companies in the consumer sector remained in the spotlight in 2025, accounting for 21% of campaigns in 2025, up from 19% in 2024, driven by a range of demands, including agitation from activists for improved returns on capital invested, A&M found. The firm noted this pressure is expected to increase in 2026, with 41 companies identified as being at risk, including in sub-sectors such as apparel, retail and personal care, where activists are expected to look closely at companies that fail to capitalize on improving household budgets. Industrials companies are also expected to face more activist attention in the face of challenges attributed to tariffs and international trade dynamics. Combined with the creative disruption being generated by AI and other geopolitical uncertainties, investors will look to executive teams to clearly demonstrate how they are navigating these opportunities and challenges to outperform, the report stated. A&M managing director Malcolm McKenzie explained: "In this AI world, investors are often scrutinizing companies' investment strategies as closely as their financials. This year, corporates need to be creative, imaginative and, above all, action oriented."

Read the article

1/6/2026

Law Firms Nab Activism Defense Stars as Competition Heats Up

Bloomberg Law (01/06/26) Hutchinson, Drew

Attorneys who specialize in defending companies against activist investors are in high demand, fueling partner moves that have boosted existing leaders such as Sidley Austin and helped other firms like Skadden become more entrenched in these specialties. Firm migration among activism attorneys has been ticking up for a couple of years with hiring that included longtime investor-side adviser Elizabeth Gonzalez-Sussman’s 2024 jump to represent companies at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Last year was no different: Firms were asking for specialists—not dabblers—as they looked for lawyers, said legal recruiter Avery Ellis, managing partner at CenterPeak LLC. The need to bolster activism defense practices stems from a rapidly changing regulatory environment governing shareholder engagement—but also the swell of activist investors, such as hedge funds, looking to influence companies on operational and financial matters, said Columbia law professor Eric Talley. “There’s been a big uptick in activism practice and with it, kind of a bidding war for the best activism-oriented attorneys out there,” he said. Activists launched 763 new campaigns in 2025, a slight uptick from the previous year’s 753, according to Bloomberg data known as league tables. Elliott Investment Management exemplified both sides of this legal work in 2025. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP helped the hedge fund engage PepsiCo Inc. (PEP), and Skadden defended Honeywell International Inc. (HON) from Elliott in the first half of the year. The Bloomberg data relies partially on law firm submissions, which catapulted Japan-based Nishimura & Asahi into third place for engagements this year after submitting its non-public work for the first time. Sidley Austin LLP held its years-long top spot as the busiest shareholder activism defense firm. Meanwhile, Latham & Watkins LLP rose to second place, up from third last year. Skadden earned the top spot for the value of campaign stakes, which represents the value of shares investors held in companies facing investor action. That’s due in part to Gonzalez-Sussman joining the firm, where she led Skadden’s existing experts to forge a formal shareholder activism unit. “When you’re dealing with a large-cap company, that’s why your numbers go up,” she said of Skadden’s $11 billion in campaign stakes. “When they’re hit with a very big activist, we’re perfectly primed to do it. That’s why our numbers in total may be lower but our dollar amounts really demonstrate that we’re representing the most high-profile activist campaigns.” Other notable personnel changes: Carmen Lu joined Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP as an activism defense partner last January after eight years at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. One month later, White & Case LLP brought on Richard Brand from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP as its global shareholder engagement head. It marked the firm’s first foray into activist-side work in the U.S. Sullivan & Cromwel LLP moved up the 2025 list of rankings after picking up two shareholder activism co-chairs from Vinson & Elkins LLP, and Sidley Austin LLP added a former Skadden activism defense partner. Firms view activism defense in different ways. It can bolster relationships with companies and funnel business into other practice areas, or it can be a specialty that carries its own weight. “You want specialists,” said Kai Liekefett, co-chair of Sidley’s shareholder activism and corporate defense practice. “If you have heart problems, would you rather go to a heart surgeon or a general practitioner?” When firms are looking for new talent, they often want people who’ve worked exclusively with either companies or activists, Ellis said. Practices themselves are often the same, either representing one or the other. But corporations and activist investors are so well-capitalized these days that representing either side feels like general commercial litigation, Talley said. Firms realize they have a lot to gain from both blue-chip companies and sophisticated investment funds. White & Case is taking a dual-sided approach, with Brand and his team representing both boards and investors. “It gives us a unique perspective,” Brand said. “If you have well-rounded corporate lawyers working on activism matters, they’re going to be more effective as advisers.” Activism is closely tied to other areas of corporate law. Lu, who joined Paul Weiss to meet client demand for shareholder activism expertise, says the firm’s M&A practice creates new clients, and vice versa. Deals close, activists pounce on the new entities, and companies need representation. Latham & Watkins has a similar dynamic. The firm serves as primary corporate governance counsel for more than 400 public companies, so shareholder activism defense growth is a testament to the firm’s overall expertise, said Christopher Drewry, global co-chair of Latham’s shareholder activism and corporate defense practice. “We’re at the top of the league tables in all of these areas,” he said. “If you treat activism as this own special thing rather than as a broader perspective,” clients lose out. Sometimes, law firms invest in activism defense experts but don’t formalize the practice group. Wachtell Lipton views itself as a board and company adviser, and shareholder activism defense is a natural outgrowth, said Elina Tetelbaum, head of activism defense. Activist-side firm Olshan is an example of a specialized operation—and it’s working out great, said Andrew Freedman, chair of its shareholder activism practice. “Because this is all we do, we’re very unique,” he said. To complement the activism practice and drive new business, the firm plans to launch a fund formation group this year, Freedman said. The practice would help clients create hedge funds or additional investment vehicles, he said. Activism defense will only become more important as more first-time activists engage with companies, Liekefett said. While the past year was the busiest he’d seen, boards are still underestimating the threat activist investors present, he said. Attorneys eyeing the space will need empathy, well-roundedness, and the ability “to be a therapist to some degree,” Liekefett said. “Most of your clients will face enormous stress,” he said.

Read the article

1/5/2026

Citgo Is a Crown Jewel of Venezuela’s Oil Industry. Elliott Is Set to Reap the Benefits

Wall Street Journal (01/05/26) Morenne, Benoît

For Elliott Investment Management, Nicolás Maduro’s swift exit comes at an auspicious time. A U.S. judge in November backed a roughly $6 billion bid by Elliott for Citgo Petroleum, the refining firm owned by Venezuela’s state-run company Petróleos de Venezuela, known as PdVSA, in a forced sale to satisfy creditors. Citgo, based in Houston, owns a U.S. network of refineries, pipelines and terminals that some analysts have said could be worth between $11 billion and $13 billion. The deal was controversial in Venezuela. Maduro’s government denounced the proposed sale as fraudulent. The board recognized by the U.S. government as the legitimate overseer of PdVSA’s overseas oil assets vowed to fight to keep Citgo under Venezuelan control. Less than two months after receiving the judge’s endorsement, Elliott is looking at a more favorable—albeit chaotic—landscape. Maduro is being held in a New York jail. President Trump has sidelined the opposition, accused Venezuela of stealing American crude and said U.S. firms would be strongly involved in its oil industry. Now, Elliott appears poised to reap the rewards of owning Venezuela’s most valuable foreign oil asset. The regime change could lead to an increase in Venezuelan oil production, which would likely provide cheap feedstock to Citgo’s Gulf Coast refineries and increase the company’s value, analysts and refining experts said. “Maduro is out, so a lot of the threat is out,” said Jay Auslander, a litigator who represents sovereign interests and private-equity funds. “It looks like a potentially quite good deal that remains high risk.” Elliott isn’t in the clear yet. The hedge fund still needs approval from the Treasury Department to conclude the deal. Plus, PdVSA and Venezuela have appealed the judicial sale. The appeal is likely to be decided in the first half of the year, and the sale can then close if the Treasury has approved it, according to people familiar with the situation. Elliott sees an alignment between the sale, which was held to satisfy some of Venezuela’s creditors, and the White House’s articulated goals of getting U.S. companies repaid for Venezuela’s previous asset seizures. Elliott has a history of clinching lucrative deals in risky locales. After Argentina defaulted on its sovereign debt in 2001, most foreign bondholders settled for pennies on the dollar, but Elliott held firm. The hedge fund spent tens of millions of dollars on a legal, lobbying and PR blitz around the world to make the country pay. The efforts eventually led to a $2 billion payday. People walk past a billboard in Caracas that reads "Give Citgo back to the Venezuelans. Vice Presidency of the working class PDVSA." After Maduro’s capture, some Republicans have sought to draw attention to Elliott’s dealings. Kentucky congressman Thomas Massie, a Trump critic, said Sunday on X that according to Grok, xAI’s chatbot, Elliott’s billionaire founder Paul Singer “stands to make billions of dollars on his distressed Citgo investment, now that this administration has taken over Venezuela.” Massie said Singer, an influential GOP donor, has already spent $1 million to defeat him in the next election. Last year, Singer gave $1 million to MAGA KY, a super PAC seeking to oust Massie, according to a filing. The investor donated about $8 million to help Trump get re-elected, and he contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee, filings show. With Citgo, Elliott is set to get its hands on one of the crown jewels of Venezuela’s energy empire. PDVSA first purchased a stake in Citgo in the 1980s before acquiring it in full in 1990. After Maduro succeeded Hugo Chávez as Venezuela’s president in 2013, continued mismanagement and under investment sapped Venezuela’s oil production. Citgo and its three U.S. refineries, which today have a combined total refining capacity of about 807,000 barrels a day, became a critical source of petrodollar revenue for Maduro’s government. That lifeline was severed in 2019. Trump enacted economic sanctions against PDVSA in a bid to empower the opposition and cripple Maduro’s regime. His administration placed control of Citgo with U.S.-backed opposition leaders and shielded it from the claims of creditors owed money by the bankrupt government in Caracas. But the opposition’s efforts to unseat Maduro failed. In 2023, the Biden administration indicated it would no longer protect Citgo from seizure, backing a forced sale of the company to satisfy the creditors, which included miner Crystallex International (CRYFQ) and oil-and-gas producer ConocoPhillips (COP). Several firms including Elliott’s affiliate Amber Energy placed bids for Citgo, with the sale proceeds earmarked for certain creditors of the refiner’s ultimate owner, the Venezuelan government. After a tortuous and contested process, a federal judge endorsed a roughly $6 billion bid by Amber. Elliott is contributing about one-third of the equity and is working with a consortium of investors, the people familiar with the situation said. Elliott sees Citgo’s refineries as good investments that it wants to hold for a while, the people said. It sees itself as a well-capitalized investor that is going to increase production of gasoline and help with the White House’s goals to keep fuel prices down. Apollo Global Management is leading debt financing for the deal, a person close to that company said. Charles Kemp, a vice president at energy consulting firm Baker & O’Brien and a former strategic planning engineer at Citgo, said opening up the floodgates of Venezuela’s production would translate into more crude making it to Gulf Coast refiners, including Citgo, at a time when these firms are looking for new sources of heavy oil. Citgo’s refineries are designed for heavy sour crude from Venezuela but since the 2019 sanctions have been running a mixture of crude from Canada and Latin American countries such as Brazil and Ecuador. “You want the cheapest, nastiest crude others can’t run,” Kemp said. “It’s definitely going to help them.” For some political experts, the sale of Citgo’s U.S. refineries would amount to Venezuela’s crude losing a guaranteed gateway to the American market. “It would be a good strategic asset to have to be able to sell some extra heavy oil in the U.S’s market,” said Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin America Energy Program at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. Alternatively, Venezuela could sign long-term contracts with American refiners, he said.

Read the article

1/5/2026

Shareholder Activism Worked in 2025. The Surge Will Continue This Year

Barron's (01/05/26) Alpert, Bill

It’s been hard for a stockpicker to beat the tech-driven gains of indexes and passive funds in recent years. One strategy investors have turned to is activist investing, where a hedge fund buys into a company and seeks new management, spinoffs, or a merger. Veteran investor funds like Elliott Investment Management and Starboard Value were among the busiest, but nearly 30% of the funds launching campaigns last year were first-timers—according to a review of 2025 activism released Monday by Barclays Bank (BARC). Last year proved a great setup for activism, said report author Jim Rossman, who heads Barclays shareholder advisory group. “Just about everything worked in their favor in 2025,” Rossman said. In the first part of the year, worries about President Donald Trump’s tariffs knocked stock values down to attractive entry points for those with activist plans. As the year progressed, the administration’s receptivity to mergers and acquisitions emboldened activists to drive deals. Merger campaigns accelerated through the year. Initiatives that demanded some kind of M&A comprised 35% of all initiatives in the first half of 2025, and 54% in the second half. The 61% of campaigns with an M&A thesis in the fourth quarter was the highest level in five years, the Barclays report said. In September, for example, Elliott launched a campaign for divestitures and improved operations at food conglomerate PepsiCo (PEP). The mining firm Barrick Mining (B) said last month that it would consider an initial offering of its North American gold assets, following Elliott’s November call for a breakup. Starboard pushed in October for the engineering firm Fluor (FLR) to sell its stake in NuScale Power (SMR), a developer of small modular nuclear reactors. In November, Fluor said it would monetize its NuScale holdings this year. All told, the number of activist campaigns last year rose to a record 255 worldwide, up about 5% from 2024. The number in the United States rose 23% from 2024, to 141. There were 142 unique activist firms waging campaigns in 2025, with Elliott easily taking the top spot by deploying $19 billion in 18 new campaigns during the year, the report said. A distant second was Starboard, putting $2 billion into 11 campaigns. HoldCo Asset Management was busy pushing for change at regional banks such as KeyCorp. A notable development in activist M&A initiatives last year was the teaming up of activists with private-equity firms and traditional fund managers, Rossman said. After Corvex Management disclosed its 4.9% position in the recruiting firm Heidrick & Struggles, the recruiter agreed to an October buyout by Corvex’s private equity unit and Advent International. In December, mutual fund manager Janus Henderson agreed to be bought by General Catalyst, after a Trian Partners campaign resulted in the departure of Janus’ CEO. Barclays thinks activists and acquirers will be motivated to get deals done before congressional midterm elections this year potentially weaken the Trump administration’s laissez-faire hand. “There are going to be a lot of opportunities for companies to go private, make dispositions and spinoffs,” Rossman said. “Activists are going to point the way.”

Read the article

1/4/2026

Activist Investors Set Record Number of Campaigns in 2025, Barclays Data Show

Reuters (01/04/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Activist investors who push companies to perform better launched a record number of campaigns in 2025, according to Barclays (BARC) data, as market volatility, favorable financing conditions and more deal activity made for ideal conditions to lobby for changes. In 2025, blue-chip investors including Elliott Investment Management as well as a sizable number of newcomers launched 255 engagements on global companies to make operational improvements, change out board members, and even consider selling themselves. Well-known brands such as athleisure maker Lululemon Athletica (LULU), ride-hailing company Lyft (LYFT), soda and snack maker PepsiCo (PEP), and cooler and drinkware maker Yeti (YETI) found themselves facing corporate agitators. Last year's number of engagements marked a nearly 5% increase over 2024 and eclipsed the previous record of 249 made in 2018, the data showed. "We went from maximum uncertainty in the first half of 2025 to M&A markets and private equity interest rebounding in the second half of the year, which made it feel like everything is possible," said Jim Rossman, global head of shareholder advisory at Barclays. "It was a great time for the activists' toolkit." The bulk of activity with more than half of all global campaigns remained in the United States, where Barclays data shows 141 campaigns took place, representing a jump of 23% from the previous year. But Asian companies also drew activists' attention, with the data showing a record 56 campaigns in Japan. This made up half of global activity outside of the United States, Barclays said. The standout investor was Elliott, which launched 18 campaigns last year, spending nearly $20 billion in capital, Barclays data showed. In the fourth quarter alone, the hedge fund took on Lululemon, where it is urging the company to consider a former Ralph Lauren (RL) executive as its next CEO, and Barrick Mining (ABX), where it is calling on management to consider breaking the company apart. Over the year, Elliott won 17 board seats, including two at Phillips 66 (PSX), where investors voted to seat candidates proposed by the hedge fund. In recent years activist investors, once derisively called corporate raiders, gained fresh acceptance among corporate management as their returns improved and many tried to work with boards to help boost a company's share price. Still, Barclays data also showed that corporate agitators' patience with chief executives can quickly wear thin. Last year, a record 32 CEOs resigned within one year of an activist campaign. In 2024, 27 CEOs resigned, up from 24 who left in 2023 after pressure from an activist. "If executives don't perform, they are out," Barclays' Rossman said.

Read the article