4/29/2029

Shareholder Activism in Asia Drives Global Total to Record High

Nikkei Asia (04/29/29) Shikata, Masayuki

Activist shareholders had their busiest year on record in 2024, with the Asia-Pacific region making up a fifth of campaigns worldwide, pushing some companies higher in the stock market and spurring others to consider going private. The worldwide tally of activist campaigns rose by six to 258, up by half from three years earlier, according to data from financial advisory Lazard. Campaigns in the Asia-Pacific tripled over that period to 57, growing about 30% on the year. Japan accounted for more than 60% of the regional total with 37, an all-time high. Activity is picking up this year as well in the run-up to general shareholders meetings in June. South Korea saw 14 campaigns, a jump of 10 from 2023. Critics say South Korean conglomerates are often controlled by minority investors that care too little about other shareholders. Australia and Hong Kong saw increases of one activist campaign each. North America made up half the global total, down from 60% in 2022 and 85% in 2014. Europe had 62 campaigns last year. The upswing in Japan has been fueled by the push for corporate governance reform since 2013 and the Tokyo Stock Exchange's 2023 call for companies to be more mindful of their share prices. The bourse has encouraged corporations to focus less on share buybacks and dividends than on steps for long-term growth, such as capital spending and the sale of unprofitable businesses. Demands for capital allocation to improve return on investment accounted for 51% of activist activity in Japan last year, significantly higher than the five-year average of 32%. U.S.-based Dalton Investments called on Japanese snack maker Ezaki Glico (2206) to amend its articles of incorporation to allow shareholder returns to be decided by investors as well, not just the board of directors. Though the proposal was rejected, it won more than 40% support, and Glico itself put forward a similar measure that was approved at the following general shareholders meeting in March. U.K.-based Palliser Capital took a stake last year in developer Tokyo Tatemono (8804) and argued that more efficient use of its capital, such as selling a cross-held stake in peer Hulic, would boost corporate value. Activist investors are increasingly seeking to lock in unrealized gains from rising land prices, reaping quick profits from property sales that can go toward dividends. Companies in the Tokyo Stock Exchange's broad Topix index had 25.88 trillion yen ($181 billion at current rates) in unrealized gains on property holdings at the end of March 2024, up about 20% from four years earlier. After buying into Mitsui Fudosan (8801) in 2024, U.S.-based Elliott Investment Management this year took a stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development (8830) and is expected to push for the developer to sell real estate holdings. This month, Dalton sent a letter to Fuji Media Holdings (4676), parent of Fuji Television, calling for it to spin off its real estate business and replace its board of directors. Activist campaigns have sparked share price rallies at some companies. Shares of elevator maker Fujitec (6406) were up roughly 80% from March 2023, when it dismissed Takakazu Uchiyama -- a member of the founding family -- as chairman under pressure from Oasis Management. The rise in demands from activists "creates a sense of tension among management, including at companies that don't receive such proposals," said Masatoshi Kikuchi, chief equity strategist at Mizuho Securities. Previously tight cross-shareholdings are being unwound, and reasonable proposals from minority investors are more likely to garner support from foreign shareholders. Some companies are going private to shield themselves from perceived pressure. Investments by buyout funds targeting mature companies in the Asia-Pacific were the highest in three years in 2024, according to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Toyota Industries (6201) is considering going this route after facing pressure from investment funds last year to take steps such as dissolving a parent-child listing with a subsidiary and buying back more shares. Toyota Industries holds a 9% stake in Toyota Motor (7203). The automaker "may have proposed having [Toyota Industries] go private as a precautionary measure," said a source at an investment bank.

Read the article

1/16/2027

Dealmakers See More Retail Mergers and IPOs in 2026 After Tariffs Sidelined M&A Last Year

Reuters (01/16/27) Summerville, Abigail

Dealmakers predict an uptick in mergers and IPOs for retailers and consumer goods companies this year after punishing tariffs on imports to the United States had sidelined activity in the industry for the first half of 2025. Several national restaurant and convenience store chains are primed for IPOs, along with organic baby food company Once Upon a Farm, Hellman & Friedman-backed auto repair company Caliber Holdings, and Bob’s Discount Furniture, which is owned by Bain Capital, according to more than two dozen CEOs, M&A advisors and private equity investors who attended the ICR Conference in Orlando, Florida this week. “The number of high-quality companies that are in queue to go public in 2026 is higher than we’ve seen since 2021,” Ben Frost, Goldman Sachs' (GS) global co-head of the consumer retail group said in an interview. “The question is does that mean more will go public? If it does, private investors will see the ability to exit investments again (in a) regular way, which will help (private equity) activity.” Frost was one of the more than 3,000 attendees at the annual gathering, where executives from Walmart (WMT.O), Shake Shack (SHAK.N), and Jersey Mike’s were among presenters while bankers, lawyers and private equity investors spent much of their time brokering deals and landing clients behind the scenes. The upbeat mood was a marked shift from last spring after U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements sent markets skidding and killed or stalled several consumer and retail deals. The second half of the year saw a resurgence in activity that brought with it several mega deals, including Kimberly-Clark’s (KMB.O) nearly $50 billion deal to buy Kenvue (KVUE.N), announced in November. "(Companies) are still really focused on growth and synergies. They’re looking at bigger deals than they’ve been willing to do for the last number of years. The back half of last year was the start of that,” Frost said. Kraft Heinz (KHC.O) announced in September it would split into two companies to unwind its 2015 merger, shortly after Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP.O) had agreed to buy JDE Peet’s for $18 billion with plans to split the coffee and non-coffee beverages into separate companies. In apparel, Gildan Activewear (GIL) bought Hanesbrands for $2.2 billion. Investors could also spur more deals and corporate breakups in the sectors, Audra Cohen, co-head of the consumer and retail group at law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, said in an interview at the conference. Corporate agitators have taken recent stakes in Lululemon Athletica (LULU.O) and Target (TGT.N), but aren't yet pushing for M&A. Lululemon hosted a morning yoga class and its management team met with analysts and investors at the conference. Meanwhile, private equity buyers are beating out companies for some deals, Manna Tree Partners co-founder Ellie Rubenstein told Reuters. Her firm sold its cottage cheese brand Good Culture to a larger consumer-focused firm L Catterton just last week. “A lot of these brands have gotten lost (inside big corporations) and the consumers don’t like it. You may see a lot of corporate carveouts this year,” Rubenstein told Reuters in an interview after her keynote address. She interviewed her billionaire father and Carlyle co-founder David Rubenstein, 76, on stage at the conference. The father-daughter pair contrasted their portfolios, pointing to Carlyle’s history of investing in fast food chains like McDonald's (MCD.N) and KFC Korea while Manna Tree saw big returns from investments in healthier food brands like pasture-raised egg producer Vital Farms (VITL.O) and Good Culture.

Read the article

2/6/2026

Commentary: Toyota’s Buyout Options all Come With a Taint

Reuters (02/06/26) Lockett, Hudson

Hudson Lockett, Reuters Breakingviews columnist, says, "The battle lines have been drawn. Toyota Motor (7203.T), its Chair Akio Toyoda, and the family's unlisted firm Toyota Fudosan insist they have “no intention” of raising their revised bid of 5.65 trillion yen ($36 billion) to take Toyota Industries private. That's far too low, Breakingviews calculates, as does Paul Singer's Elliott Investment Management, which is lobbying other independent investors not to sell shares in the tender offer that closes on Thursday. Whatever happens in the next few days, though, this deal will stand as a lesson in how to conduct M&A badly. If the buyer consortium wins, it - and by extension the Toyota brand - will be marked as shortchanging shareholders. At 18,800 yen-per-share, the new offer put on the table last month merely adjusted for the increase in Industries' holdings in other publicly traded Toyota companies and undervalues the target by 40%, Breakingviews calculates. The bidders have a big advantage in their push to obtain the 67% of shares necessary for a squeeze out: thanks to Toyota group holdings and those of allies, they have 50% already locked up. But a win would not be the end of the affair. Elliott, which owns 7.1% of Industries, would probably take the new owners to court to have the price reappraised. Japanese judges are typically wary of ruling on matters of valuation, but in October 2024, Tokyo’s high court ruled in favor of Oasis Management that the fair value of FamilyMart shares was 13% higher than Itochu's (8001.T) successful buyout offer. That case is still under appeal but will embolden shareholders to keep challenging lowball deals. Comments published on Thursday by the Asian Corporate Governance Association would strengthen Elliott's case. It points out potential red flags in how Industries' board special committee conducted negotiations. It also estimates that the median price for Japanese tender offers launched since fair M&A guidelines were introduced in 2019 is 2.5 times book value; Breakingviews calculates Toyoda and team are dangling a ratio of just 0.9 times book. Insiders can try to avoid court by meaningfully increasing the price. There's a good reason to do so: with the shares trading above the tender offer, index funds are unlikely to sell, and they hold around 19%. Add on Elliott's stake, and that's not far short of the 33.1% needed to block the deal. Bumping up the bid would help secure more support, but at the cost of a loss of face for the corporate titan. The other possibility is that they don't raise the price, investors block the buyout and the Toyota trio walk away from the transaction. That would expose them as cynical opportunists only willing to strike a deal at the heavy expense of supine independent shareholders. All these options would leave a taint on Toyota group. If nothing else, other Japanese corporations considering how to unwind cross-shareholdings may learn how not to do it from its example."

Read the article

2/2/2026

Proxy Battle Crashes Jack’s Birthday Party

San Diego Business Journal (02/02/2026) Bloodworth, Donald

Quick-service restaurant chain Jack in the Box Inc. (Nasdaq: JACK) appears to be headed toward a proxy fight, with an investor calling for change on the company board. Sardar Biglari, 48, runs Biglari Capital Corp. and Biglari Holdings (NYSE: BH) as well as other businesses. He is CEO of Steak ’n Shake and owner of the Western Sizzlin steakhouse chain. Biglari’s entities have amassed slightly less than 10% of Jack in the Box stock. A proxy statement sent to Jack in the Box stockholders by Biglari Capital states that “shareholders need to send a strong message” to their board “that the status quo is unacceptable. This message can be rendered by voting against the reelection of Chairman David Goebel.” Jack in the Box has set its annual meeting for Feb. 27. The moves come as Jack in the Box works to stem losses and get back on the path to growth following several setbacks, including the purchase and money-losing sale of Del Taco. A company representative said people should get their information from the proxy statement filed by Jack in the Box Inc. “The Board recommends that you simply disregard any materials sent to you by, or on behalf of, the Biglari Group,” says a proxy statement filed by the corporation, dated Jan. 21. “We are not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any information provided by, or relating to, the Biglari Group contained in any proxy solicitation materials filed or disseminated by, or on behalf of, the Biglari Group or any statements that the Biglari Group or its representatives have made or may otherwise make.” Goebel, 75, has been a company director since 2008 and chairman since 2020. He brings more than 40 years of leadership in retail, food service and hospitality to his job as chairman. “We believe that, under the right leadership and oversight, JACK can achieve long-term success, and we remain committed to working with leadership toward that end,” the proxy statement from Biglari Capital says. “In our view, however, the incumbent board does not have the right experience, skill set and/or willingness to address strategic missteps and reverse years of stockholder value destruction. As such, we felt compelled to take further action by bringing these issues directly to shareholders and allowing them to voice their dissatisfaction with the board and the company.” In addition to removing a board member, Biglari Capital’s proxy statement asks shareholders to reject pay raises for executives. Proxy statements from both Jack in the Box and Biglari Capital give timelines of events. According to Biglari Capital’s proxy statement, Biglari met with company officials in 2024 and 2025 to discuss finances, operations, his desire to sit on the board and whether his representatives might sit on the board. The Jack in the Box proxy statement says at one point, Biglari Group notified the company it was withdrawing its nomination of Biglari to the board. In November, Jack in the Box appointed two new board members and enlarged the board from eight to 10 members. Mark King and Alan Smolinisky joined the board in connection with a cooperation agreement between the company and one of its stockholders, GreenWood Investors LLC. Biglari Capital’s proxy statement alleges that Jack in the Box lost $460 million in its purchase and subsequent sale of Del Taco. “How can shareholders trust a board that just squandered $460 million?” the proxy statement says. The document also takes issue with the board hiring three CEOs in the last decade. This is not Biglari’s first push for change in the restaurant industry. According to Fortune magazine, the executive has attempted seven proxy battles with Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRL) and took part in the spirited national debate when the restaurant chain changed its logo last year. A shareholder dispute is not the kind of thing Jack in the Box’s marketing team wants to focus on. In addition to steering customers toward Jack in the Box stores, they would prefer to celebrate the 75th anniversary of Robert Peterson opening his first Jack in the Box store on El Cajon Boulevard in 1951. The year will bring several promotions and limited-time menu items to the chain, which now has roughly 2,135 company-owned and franchise outlets across the United States. On Jan. 14, the company invited a dozen reporters, bloggers, and TikTok videographers to the big kitchen in its corporate headquarters on Kearny Mesa. There they got the lowdown on 2026 promotions and assembled their own “Hot Mess” cheeseburgers, replete with runny cheese sauce, jalapeños and onion rings, all on a sourdough roll. The concoction was introduced in 2013 and will be available in stores this month. Meanwhile, the company is working on its financial situation. In mid-November, Jack in the Box reported same store sales in its fourth quarter declined 7.4% over Q4 of 2024, far surpassing the 2.1% decline reported one year ago. The business attributed the loss to a decrease in transactions and what it called “an unfavorable menu mix.” The business plans to report quarterly financial results again on Feb. 18. Shortly after the beginning of the year (Jan. 9), Jack in the Box announced that it repaid $105 million in debt – specifically its Series 2019-1 4.476% fixed rate senior secured notes, Class A-2-II. The move “reflects the meaningful progress we continue to make toward strengthening our balance sheet and positioning the company for sustainable growth under ‘JACK on Track,’” said CEO Lance Tucker, referring to the campaign to improve the business. “Our efforts to improve long-term financial performance, accelerate cash flow and simplify our company while preserving growth-oriented capital investments are working, and we remain committed to executing against these strategic priorities to deliver value for our shareholders.” The business says it plans to continue to pay down debt through a combination of cash on hand and targeted real estate sales. Jack in the Box announced on Dec. 22 that its sale of Del Taco Holdings Inc. to Northern California-based Yadav Enterprises had closed, bringing in approximately $109 million cash. The remaining $10 million is in the form of a 21-day promissory note. As Jack in the Box works to improve its financial situation, the promotions roll on. One of Jack in the Box’s giveaways this year is a collection of “Jibbi” bag charms – Jack in the Box characters rendered in the popular Japanese-inspired style. The company has also collaborated with The Hundreds, the Los Angeles-area streetwear brand. “The partnership taps into a larger cultural moment where food, fashion and identity are all becoming one, as brands move beyond traditional categories to meet fans where they are,” according to marketing materials.

Read the article

2/2/2026

Investor Engagement Reshapes Appian’s Strategic Landscape

Ad Hoc News (02/02/26)

Appian (NASDAQ: APPN), the enterprise software specialist, faces a pivotal period shaped by two significant developments. The entry of a notable shareholder and a dramatic reversal in a high-stakes legal battle have fundamentally altered the company's outlook. With management now under increased scrutiny, investor attention is zeroing in on the imminent release of the company's annual financial results. Adding a layer of complexity is the recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Virginia in Appian's lawsuit against rival Pegasystems (NASDAQ: PEGA). In early January, the court overturned a previous multi-billion dollar judgment in Appian's favor, ordering a new trial. This decision transforms a potential financial windfall into a long-term uncertainty, complicating investment calculations. Market analysts are divided in their assessment of the company amidst this confluence of events. Barclays maintains a skeptical stance, pointing to Appian's premium valuation relative to peers in the process automation sector. Conversely, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) has recently highlighted the firm's growth potential within the government vertical. All eyes are now on February 19, 2026, when the company is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results before the U.S. markets open. During the subsequent conference call at 14:30 CET, executives must demonstrate that growth in cloud-based subscription revenue meets expectations. Investors will also listen closely for management's 2026 guidance, framed against the new reality of activist pressure. In late January, it was revealed that investment firm Fivespan Partners has accumulated a 6.2% stake in Appian. Such activist engagements typically aim to push for operational improvements or evaluate strategic alternatives, including a potential sale. For Appian's leadership team, this translates to significantly tighter monitoring of their strategic decisions in the coming months. A central question is whether management can simultaneously meet the expectations of this new major shareholder and the broader investor base. The answer will largely depend on the efficiency of the company's progress in integrating automated workflows for enterprise clients—a sector analysts currently deem critically important.

Read the article

1/30/2026

The GameStop CEO Has an Audacious Plan to Clinch His $35 Billion Payday

Wall Street Journal (01/30/26) Thomas, Lauren; Rudegeair, Peter

GameStop (GME) shares have dropped around 80% since the retailer’s reign as king of meme stocks in 2021. Its chairman and chief executive has an ambitious plan to turn that slide around—and has Michael Burry of “The Big Short” fame cheering him on. GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen told The Wall Street Journal in an interview that he is aiming to turn the $11 billion company into a $100 billion-plus juggernaut. This larger company would do much more than just sell video games and collectibles. To do this, he is eyeing a major acquisition of a publicly traded company, likely in the consumer or retail industry, where he has spent most of his career. He has his sights set on a handful of companies that he declined to identify and plans to approach potential targets soon. Any deal will be “big,” the 40-year-old billionaire said. “It’s ultimately either going to be genius or totally, totally foolish.” Cohen co-founded online pet-products retailer Chewy (CHWY) in 2011. He served as its CEO through 2018 after leading the company to an over $3 billion sale to PetSmart. He pivoted to activist investing for a time, agitating for change at companies including Nordstrom (JWN) and Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), where he faced allegations—that he denied—of misleading investors. He said a few years ago he was modeling his strategy after those of Warren Buffett and Carl Icahn, finding undervalued stocks like the former and pressing for change like the latter. Earlier this month, GameStop’s board of directors adjusted Cohen’s compensation package to give him extra incentive to boost the company’s market value and profitability. He stands to make as much as $35 billion in stock if certain criteria are met. Part of the award starts vesting if GameStop’s market value reaches $20 billion and a measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization reaches $2 billion. To get the full award, GameStop’s market value must reach $100 billion and the Ebitda measure must reach $10 billion. More executives have been following the lead of Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, whose multibillion-dollar pay package from 2018 laid the groundwork for other moonshot pay deals. In November, Tesla shareholders approved a fresh record-setting pay deal for Musk that promises as much as $1 trillion in additional stock if certain milestones are reached. “This structure ensures that Mr. Cohen’s incentives are directly aligned with creating long-term value for GameStop’s stockholders,” GameStop said in a filing detailing the changes. Meanwhile, Cohen has been buying up more GameStop shares, including as recently as this month. He now has a stake of over 9% and remains the biggest individual shareholder in the business. The recent changes caught the attention of Burry, the doctor-turned-hedge-fund-manager whose bets against subprime mortgage bonds were chronicled in the Michael Lewis book. Burry closed his fund last year to launch a paid Substack newsletter. Burry wrote earlier this week that the video game retailer should run the Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) playbook and use its giant cash holdings to make transformative acquisitions. Cohen “has a crappy business, and he is milking it best he can while taking advantage of the meme stock phenomenon to raise cash and wait for an opportunity to make a big buy of a real growing cash cow business,” Burry wrote. Burry, a GameStop shareholder, said in the newsletter he bought more stock recently and sees upside in the company should Cohen spend $10 billion or more to acquire a quality business, such as an insurer with plenty of customer premiums to invest. GameStop’s substantial net operating losses, which allow it to offset future taxable income, could also make it an ideal acquirer for many targets, Burry wrote. Cohen told the Journal that he hasn’t spoken to Burry since at least 2019. “He’s one of the few investors I respect,” he said. “He has a track record of making prescient early calls.” Cohen gained a cult following after he built a big GameStop stake and in late 2020 criticized the company for moving too slowly toward e-commerce. He joined GameStop’s board in January 2021, when the business had a market value of a little over $1 billion. He rose to become chairman later that year and vowed to transform the struggling retailer into an e-commerce giant. The stock took off. So-called meme-stock investors poured into GameStop in droves and fueled a massive rally, many with a desire to squeeze out short-selling hedge funds that had bet against the business. GameStop shares reached a high of $120.75 five years ago this week. They closed at $22.81 Thursday. Cohen bristles at the term meme stock, telling the Journal it is “a label people use when they don’t want to do the work” on a stock. “You either create value over time or you don’t,” he said. Cohen said GameStop is finally in a good position to make bolder moves, after recent efforts to sell more collectibles and shut underperforming stores. GameStop has around $9 billion in cash and liquid securities on its balance sheet that could help fund a deal. “There are a lot of diamonds in the rough…that have sleepy management teams,” Cohen said about the retail industry. “I didn’t fix GameStop to stop there.”

Read the article

1/29/2026

How Investors Turned a Toyota Buyout into a Battleground

Reuters (01/29/26) Shiraki, Maki; Leussink, Daniel; Dolan, David; et al.

Toyota's plan to take an affiliate private looked unremarkable at first. Instead, the bid for Toyota Industries (6201.T), or TICO, ignited a battle between investors demanding top dollar and a Japanese corporate culture that prizes stakeholder harmony over shareholder returns. This month, Toyota sweetened its bid by 15% to around $27.8 billion but failed to quell the uprising. Elliott Investment Management said the revised 18,800 yen-a-share offer undervalued TICO by almost 40%, and potentially much more as a standalone entity. The U.S.-based fund, which holds 6.7% of TICO, has attacked the bid as opaque and said it falls short of basic governance standards. Since Toyota announced its initial 16,300 yen-a-share offer in June, Elliott has led the charge for a higher price. The standoff pits Paul Singer's fund, known for extracting big paydays from Argentina and Peru, against the world's largest automaker and its chairman, Akio Toyoda. The 69-year-old grandson of Toyota's founder has a personal stake in the outcome: He's investing about $6.5 million to boost his TICO holding from 0.05% to 0.5% and tighten his grip on the maker of forklifts, engines and RAV4 SUVs. The pushback threatens to upend Toyota's plans to revamp a key affiliate. Elliott has urged investors not to take the offer price, arguing TICO would be worth more independent -- a gambit that could force Toyota to pay significantly more or kill the deal outright. This account of how a routine buyout turned into a corporate battle is based on regulatory filings and interviews with more than two dozen people, including investors and Toyota group executives. It shows how the transaction has become a test case for dealmaking in Japan -- and whether the principle of "sanpo yoshi," which prizes benefits to all stakeholders and society, can withstand pressure from shareholders. "Over the years, Toyota has tended to annoy investors because it doesn't really care about shareholders," said Stephen Codrington, CEO of research firm Codrington Japan. Toyota rejects that view. A representative said the group sees shareholders as important and their support as critical to growth. In an interview with Reuters just before the bid was raised, Masahiro Yamamoto, the automaker's chief risk officer, said it was incorrect to portray talks with shareholders as confrontational. A representative for Toyota Fudosan, the real-estate unit leading the buyout, this week defended the offer, saying it reflected TICO's intrinsic value and represented a premium to historic market prices. A TICO representative said it had taken steps to ensure the bid was transparent, including consulting outside directors and independent firms, and received three fairness opinions. An Elliott spokesperson declined to comment in response to written questions from Reuters. Founded in 1926 as Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, TICO later added an automobile division, spun off as Toyota Motor (7203.T) in 1937. Toyota says it wants to take TICO private to remove the burden of short-term profit targets as the group pivots to connected cars and advanced software. After the deal was announced, TICO shares settled near the offer price, signaling confidence Toyota would succeed. But overseas investors, alarmed by what they saw as opaque financial disclosure and shoddy treatment of minority shareholders, complained to the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) over the summer that the transaction went against its drive to improve governance, two people briefed on the matter said. The TSE had never experienced such "fury" from investors, said one of the people. The exchange declined to comment on the complaints, which haven't been previously reported. In September, TICO shares began to tick higher as investors bet Toyota would bump the price. That conviction deepened when Elliott disclosed its stake in November. Still, Toyota executives gave no sign of budging. Following investor complaints, Kenta Kon, a director at Toyota Fudosan, told other executives that raising the price to appease some shareholders would create a dangerous precedent, according to two people. Kon contended that such a move would amount to "He who speaks the loudest wins," these people said, unfairly rewarding some stakeholders because they created a fuss. In an interview, Kon, who is also the automaker's chief financial officer, told Reuters he didn't recall using that expression. The group had been "careful to ensure that we do not prioritize anyone unfairly," he said. As TICO's shares kept rising, a buoyant market also lifted the value of its cross-shareholdings in other Toyota companies, which investors said made the offer price look less attractive. "They've tried to buy Toyota Industries on the cheap, and now they have to face a bull market in the cross-shareholdings that Toyota Industries holds," said Hugh Sloane, co-founder of Sloane Robinson Investment Management in London, who holds shares in TICO. He doesn't plan to tender his shares, he said. In mid-December, TICO executives wrote to Toyota Fudosan urging it to increase the offer, citing the rising share price, a regulatory filing showed. Toyota Fudosan eventually settled on 18,800 yen, which TICO accepted as final, according to the filing. TICO shares closed at 19,585 yen on Wednesday. Another rationale for the TICO deal is to unwind its holdings in other Toyota companies and better align the group with TSE governance changes intended to improve shareholder value. Yet the backlash has eclipsed previous governance complaints against Toyota. In August, the Asian Corporate Governance Association advocacy group raised concerns about the buyout in a letter to TICO and Toyota signed by some two dozen investors. They cited inadequate financial disclosure and said Toyota group companies shouldn't be classified as minority shareholders, as that lowers the voting threshold Toyota would need to clinch the deal. The Toyota Fudosan representative said the group companies were independent, listed firms that made their own decisions. TICO released more financial details this month. Not everyone views Japan's efforts to prioritize shareholders as entirely positive. Japan risks having its manufacturing prowess eroded by U.S.-style "short-termism and financialization" where quarterly earnings take precedence over long-term investment, said Ulrike Schaede, a professor of Japanese business at University of California San Diego. One executive at a Toyota group company said those complaining about price were chasing quick returns, at odds with the longer-term view typically taken by Japanese companies. A person familiar with Elliott's thinking said the fund had approached the deal with a focus on corporate value and that had resonated with other investors. The Toyota representative said the group recognizes investors may have different investment horizons. Inside the Toyota group, there is a "sense of concern" about Elliott, one person said, adding the automaker hadn't expected the fund to start raising its stake last month. Elliott has been a shareholder in TICO for more than a year, two people said. It first confirmed a 3.3% holding in November, which it has since doubled. In a filing that month, the fund flagged that it could increase its stake to 20% or more.

Read the article

1/29/2026

Proxy-Voting Trends in 2025: Widening Gaps in Asset Manager Voting Preferences

Morningstar (01/29/26) Stewart, Lindsey

Morningstar's latest research paper looks at the proxy-voting patterns of 50 of the largest U.S. managers of equity and allocation funds. The researchers found that as a group, voters at these entities have become more supportive of management over recent years. Average support for management resolutions at companies in the Morningstar U.S. Large-Mid Cap index increased in the 2025 proxy year to just over 96% from close to 95% in the prior two years. The increase was largely driven by greater support for director elections, which make up around 78% of all management resolutions each year. Advisory votes on executive compensation (which comprise around 8% of all management resolutions) consistently attract around 10% shareholder opposition each year on average. However, there has also been a noticeable increase in support for these proposals in the last three proxy years. Meanwhile, over the same period, average support for shareholder resolutions fell. Shareholder proposals on environmental and social themes fared worst, with these bearing the strongest impacts from the SEC’s actions during the year. However, when the top 50 U.S. asset managers were split according to size, the opposite of coordinated activity is observed. In fact, there’s a marked divergence between the voting patterns of the largest 10 US asset managers and the other 40 U.S. managers in the study. The top 10 include the Big Three index managers: BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard, and State Street (STT); plus Capital Group, Dimensional, Fidelity including funds subadvised by Geode, Invesco (IVZ), J.P. Morgan (JPM), Schwab (SCHW), and T. Rowe Price (TROW). Looking first at management resolutions, the top 10 asset managers recorded the strongest increases in support for management resolutions. Average support for management resolutions among the top 10 U.S. managers increased to 97.5% in the 2025 proxy year compared with 97.1% in 2024 and 96.1% in 2023. Among the Big Three index managers, the same trend with higher support levels was observed. On average, the Big Three managers backed 98.7% of management resolutions in the 2025 proxy year, compared with 98.0% in 2024 and 96.0% in 2023. In contrast, the remaining 40 U.S. managers’ average support stood at around 94% to 95% over the past three years, with a slight increase in 2025. In the past three proxy years, average percentage support for shareholder resolutions by the Big Three index managers stood in single digits. In 2025, this number stood at 7.5%, having fallen from around 9.0% in the previous two proxy years. A falling trend in support for the top 10 as a whole was also observed. On average, the 10 firms cast 12.4% of their fund votes in support of shareholder proposals in the 2025 proxy year, down slightly from 13.3% in 2024 and 15.2% in 2025. The other 40 firms’ average support for shareholder resolutions also displayed a falling trend but stood consistently higher than that of the top 10 over the three-year period. In the 2025 proxy year, the 40 firms’ average support for shareholder resolutions was 28.8%, compared with 34.6% in 2024 and 38.2% in 2023. It’s worth also mentioning the differences in voting patterns by sustainable funds and European managers. Both groups show noticeably lower-than-average support for management resolutions, and higher than average support for shareholder resolutions over the last three years. Asset owners rely on proxy-voting records to assess alignment between their own objectives and the asset managers they appoint. The data from Morningstar set out in our paper can help asset owners make that assessment. The clear differences in approach to proxy-voting by asset managers can be a boon to asset owners seeking close alignment between their governance and sustainability priorities and asset managers’ implementation methods. We’ve already seen asset owners in the United States and Europe seek better alignment by shifting mandates, or considering doing so. But with ongoing regulatory and political scrutiny of proxy-voting practices, it remains challenging to contend with the constantly shifting landscape.

Read the article

1/28/2026

Elliott Stands a Chance at Foiling Controversial Toyota Deal

Bloomberg (01/28/26) Takahashi, Nicholas; French, Alice

At first glance, Elliott Investment Management appears to have an insurmountable disadvantage in its campaign to block the business group behind Toyota Motor Corp. (TM) from buying out a key unit in one of Japan’s largest take-private deals of all time. After all, the group already owns about 48% of Toyota Industries Corp. (6201), and holds deep ties with many of the buyout target’s top minority shareholders. Meanwhile, the U.S. fund only has a 6.7% stake — a far cry from what’s needed to scuttle what it describes as a lowball offer before the tender period closes on Feb. 12. So Toyota may look closer to the two-thirds majority required to push through the deal than the 33% of eligible shares Elliott needs to block it, but a closer look indicates billionaire Paul Singer’s fund may not be so far from pulling it off. Elliott may only need the support of an additional 7% of voting shares to win, according to Travis Lundy, an independent analyst who’s been involved in Japanese equities and investor activism for over two decades. That’s because he’s betting passive investors, which hold shares as part of index funds or ETFs and account for about 19% of the voting rights, won’t sell to Toyota at the below-market offer of ¥18,800 a share. Should Elliott prevail, it would go down as one of the biggest victories for shareholder activism in Japan. Such an outcome, which may dilute the founding family’s stronghold on the business empire, is likely to embolden other investors to agitate for changes in the country’s tight-knit business community. “The deal is going in the blockable direction,” Lundy said in an interview. “If you take the combination of what Elliott has, what Elliott might have, what Elliott could do, and what other people have and could do, I would be surprised if this got done at ¥18,800.” The offer values Toyota Industries at ¥6.1 trillion, though Toyota group is seeking to buy the shares it doesn’t own in the unit through a ¥4.3 trillion tender offer bid, which would make it one of the biggest acquisitions of its kind in Japan. When adding a separate transaction tied to the buyout, the group estimates the Toyota Industries privatization would cost ¥5.4 trillion. Elliott declined to comment beyond its public statements, while Toyota Industries said it plans to keep holding sincere talks with all shareholders. Toyota Fudosan Co., which is leading the buyout, said it will continue striving to gain shareholders’ understanding. Toyota Motor declined to comment. Since revealing in November it had taken a stake in Toyota Industries, Elliott has already managed to pressure Toyota to raise its initial offer by 15%. But the fund continues to urge other investors to spurn Toyota, arguing that the shares are worth at least ¥26,000 each and could climb to ¥40,000 in a couple of years if the company were to remain a standalone company. On Tuesday, Elliott stepped up its campaign by issuing a 52-page presentation laying out its case against the deal. The fund is even weighing a counter-bid for Toyota Industries, according to a Nikkei report on Wednesday. It’s a “reasonably safe assumption” that passive investors won’t tender their shares unless Toyota raises its offer above the market price, according to Lundy, who’s based in Hong Kong. Tendering below the market price would present an “asymmetric downside risk” for passive fund managers, whose performance needs to track the broader stock benchmarks, Lundy said. Toyota Industries shares have traded above the offer price since the revised offer and closed at ¥19,855 on Thursday. According to Lundy, passive investors such as BlackRock Inc. (BLK) could boost the Elliott camp’s share of voting rights, which exclude treasury shares, to about 26%. BlackRock declined to comment. Meanwhile, the Toyota camp probably has about 55% of Toyota Industries voting rights “locked up” when counting things such as cross-shareholdings, according to Lundy’s estimates. Still, beating one of the country’s most storied and well-connected conglomerates would be a tall task. “Many investors think there’s little point in trying to resist the Toyota group,” said Masatoshi Kikuchi, an equity strategist at Mizuho Securities Co. While shareholders such as Elliott may protest the price, the deal still has a good chance of going ahead, he said. Toyota Industries counts the country’s public pension fund as well as megabanks and major insurers among its investors, with many of their stakes representing cross-shareholdings. “These institutions are likely to tender their shares, unless the share price rises sustainably above the offer,” said Bloomberg Intelligence senior auto analyst Tatsuo Yoshida. Yet Elliott isn’t alone in balking at the offer. “We find it difficult to regard the proposed price increase as appropriate,” said Kaz Sakai, head of Japan research at UK-based fund Asset Value Investors Ltd. Sakai declined to say whether the fund, which holds about 0.1% of Toyota Industries, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, would tender its shares.

Read the article