4/29/2029

Shareholder Activism in Asia Drives Global Total to Record High

Nikkei Asia (04/29/29) Shikata, Masayuki

Activist shareholders had their busiest year on record in 2024, with the Asia-Pacific region making up a fifth of campaigns worldwide, pushing some companies higher in the stock market and spurring others to consider going private. The worldwide tally of activist campaigns rose by six to 258, up by half from three years earlier, according to data from financial advisory Lazard. Campaigns in the Asia-Pacific tripled over that period to 57, growing about 30% on the year. Japan accounted for more than 60% of the regional total with 37, an all-time high. Activity is picking up this year as well in the run-up to general shareholders meetings in June. South Korea saw 14 campaigns, a jump of 10 from 2023. Critics say South Korean conglomerates are often controlled by minority investors that care too little about other shareholders. Australia and Hong Kong saw increases of one activist campaign each. North America made up half the global total, down from 60% in 2022 and 85% in 2014. Europe had 62 campaigns last year. The upswing in Japan has been fueled by the push for corporate governance reform since 2013 and the Tokyo Stock Exchange's 2023 call for companies to be more mindful of their share prices. The bourse has encouraged corporations to focus less on share buybacks and dividends than on steps for long-term growth, such as capital spending and the sale of unprofitable businesses. Demands for capital allocation to improve return on investment accounted for 51% of activist activity in Japan last year, significantly higher than the five-year average of 32%. U.S.-based Dalton Investments called on Japanese snack maker Ezaki Glico (2206) to amend its articles of incorporation to allow shareholder returns to be decided by investors as well, not just the board of directors. Though the proposal was rejected, it won more than 40% support, and Glico itself put forward a similar measure that was approved at the following general shareholders meeting in March. U.K.-based Palliser Capital took a stake last year in developer Tokyo Tatemono (8804) and argued that more efficient use of its capital, such as selling a cross-held stake in peer Hulic, would boost corporate value. Activist investors are increasingly seeking to lock in unrealized gains from rising land prices, reaping quick profits from property sales that can go toward dividends. Companies in the Tokyo Stock Exchange's broad Topix index had 25.88 trillion yen ($181 billion at current rates) in unrealized gains on property holdings at the end of March 2024, up about 20% from four years earlier. After buying into Mitsui Fudosan (8801) in 2024, U.S.-based Elliott Investment Management this year took a stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development (8830) and is expected to push for the developer to sell real estate holdings. This month, Dalton sent a letter to Fuji Media Holdings (4676), parent of Fuji Television, calling for it to spin off its real estate business and replace its board of directors. Activist campaigns have sparked share price rallies at some companies. Shares of elevator maker Fujitec (6406) were up roughly 80% from March 2023, when it dismissed Takakazu Uchiyama -- a member of the founding family -- as chairman under pressure from Oasis Management. The rise in demands from activists "creates a sense of tension among management, including at companies that don't receive such proposals," said Masatoshi Kikuchi, chief equity strategist at Mizuho Securities. Previously tight cross-shareholdings are being unwound, and reasonable proposals from minority investors are more likely to garner support from foreign shareholders. Some companies are going private to shield themselves from perceived pressure. Investments by buyout funds targeting mature companies in the Asia-Pacific were the highest in three years in 2024, according to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Toyota Industries (6201) is considering going this route after facing pressure from investment funds last year to take steps such as dissolving a parent-child listing with a subsidiary and buying back more shares. Toyota Industries holds a 9% stake in Toyota Motor (7203). The automaker "may have proposed having [Toyota Industries] go private as a precautionary measure," said a source at an investment bank.

Read the article

1/16/2027

Dealmakers See More Retail Mergers and IPOs in 2026 After Tariffs Sidelined M&A Last Year

Reuters (01/16/27) Summerville, Abigail

Dealmakers predict an uptick in mergers and IPOs for retailers and consumer goods companies this year after punishing tariffs on imports to the United States had sidelined activity in the industry for the first half of 2025. Several national restaurant and convenience store chains are primed for IPOs, along with organic baby food company Once Upon a Farm, Hellman & Friedman-backed auto repair company Caliber Holdings, and Bob’s Discount Furniture, which is owned by Bain Capital, according to more than two dozen CEOs, M&A advisors and private equity investors who attended the ICR Conference in Orlando, Florida this week. “The number of high-quality companies that are in queue to go public in 2026 is higher than we’ve seen since 2021,” Ben Frost, Goldman Sachs' (GS) global co-head of the consumer retail group said in an interview. “The question is does that mean more will go public? If it does, private investors will see the ability to exit investments again (in a) regular way, which will help (private equity) activity.” Frost was one of the more than 3,000 attendees at the annual gathering, where executives from Walmart (WMT.O), Shake Shack (SHAK.N), and Jersey Mike’s were among presenters while bankers, lawyers and private equity investors spent much of their time brokering deals and landing clients behind the scenes. The upbeat mood was a marked shift from last spring after U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements sent markets skidding and killed or stalled several consumer and retail deals. The second half of the year saw a resurgence in activity that brought with it several mega deals, including Kimberly-Clark’s (KMB.O) nearly $50 billion deal to buy Kenvue (KVUE.N), announced in November. "(Companies) are still really focused on growth and synergies. They’re looking at bigger deals than they’ve been willing to do for the last number of years. The back half of last year was the start of that,” Frost said. Kraft Heinz (KHC.O) announced in September it would split into two companies to unwind its 2015 merger, shortly after Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP.O) had agreed to buy JDE Peet’s for $18 billion with plans to split the coffee and non-coffee beverages into separate companies. In apparel, Gildan Activewear (GIL) bought Hanesbrands for $2.2 billion. Investors could also spur more deals and corporate breakups in the sectors, Audra Cohen, co-head of the consumer and retail group at law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, said in an interview at the conference. Corporate agitators have taken recent stakes in Lululemon Athletica (LULU.O) and Target (TGT.N), but aren't yet pushing for M&A. Lululemon hosted a morning yoga class and its management team met with analysts and investors at the conference. Meanwhile, private equity buyers are beating out companies for some deals, Manna Tree Partners co-founder Ellie Rubenstein told Reuters. Her firm sold its cottage cheese brand Good Culture to a larger consumer-focused firm L Catterton just last week. “A lot of these brands have gotten lost (inside big corporations) and the consumers don’t like it. You may see a lot of corporate carveouts this year,” Rubenstein told Reuters in an interview after her keynote address. She interviewed her billionaire father and Carlyle co-founder David Rubenstein, 76, on stage at the conference. The father-daughter pair contrasted their portfolios, pointing to Carlyle’s history of investing in fast food chains like McDonald's (MCD.N) and KFC Korea while Manna Tree saw big returns from investments in healthier food brands like pasture-raised egg producer Vital Farms (VITL.O) and Good Culture.

Read the article

2/23/2026

Hedge Funds Are Betting Big on Industrials in 2026. Here Are Their Favorite Picks

CNBC Pro (02/23/26) Imbert, Fred

Industrials are the “it” sector of the stock market for hedge funds. Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) analyzed regulatory filings from more than 1,000 hedge funds – with gross equity positions totaling $4.4 trillion to start the year – and found that most funds are heavily overweight industrials. The bank said hedge funds entered 2026 overweight the sector by more than 7.34 percentage points relative to the Russell 3000, a record. “Hedge funds rotated toward cyclical sectors during 4Q 2025. Funds increased overweights in Industrials by +371 bp, the largest change of any sector,” Goldman strategist Ben Snider wrote. That allocation has paid off thus far. The S&P 500 industrials sector is up 14.2% year to date. That makes it the third-best performer in that time. Over the past 12 months, industrials are up a whopping 31.5%, making the sector the biggest gainer within the benchmark over that period. Goldman Sachs also found the industrial stocks that hedge funds bought into the most, looking at the ones with the largest net position increased quarter over quarter. T1 Energy (NYSE: TE), which makes electrical components and equipment, saw 36 hedge funds increase positions in the fourth quarter of 2025 from the third quarter. Shares are down 7% year to date, but they have soared more than 250% over the past 12 months. In the past three months, the stock is also up more than 128%. Carrier Global (NYSE: CARR) was also among the most popular industrial picks among hedge funds, with 33 adding to their positions. The stock has climbed more than 21% in 2026. Other popular industrials among hedge funds include ITT (NYSE: ITT), Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE), and Everus Construction (NYSE: ECG).

Read the article

2/21/2026

Cevian and Artisan Partners Sink Their Teeth Into Pearson

The Times (London) (02/21/26) Turvill, William

Cevian and Artisan Partners have built up huge stakes in FTSE 100 education giant Pearson, meaning that more than a third of its stock is now held by potentially troublesome shareholders. Cevian, the Swedish giant backed by U.S. activist Carl Icahn, now has an 18% stake in the business. Previously, when its stake stood at 12%, the fund said Pearson should move its share listing from London to New York. U.S.-based Artisan Partners, a long-term “value” investor that has previously lobbied for change at Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Danone (OTCMKTS: DANOY), and Credit Suisse, has also doubled its stake, from 5% to 10%, it disclosed last week. Artisan said it was “open” to a stock market move but was not actively pushing for one. London’s Silchester, a publicity-shy investor, also has a stake of nearly 6%. Pearson, led by former Accenture (NYSE: ACN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) executive Omar Abbosh since 2024, has experienced a rough ride on the stock market over the past year, with shares down 32% leaving it with a market value of £5.8 billion. Before its recent fall, prompted in part by fears of disruption from artificial intelligence (AI), Pearson, which has its headquarters in the UK but makes most of its money in the United States, had been on a strong run. Tyler Redd, an analyst at Artisan, said his firm saw Pearson as an undervalued stock that offered a long-term value. He said that some investors had incorrectly placed Pearson in the “AI loser bucket.” Managing director David Samra said Artisan was “very happy” with Abbosh’s leadership and the direction of the business. Asked about whether Pearson should move its listing to New York, he said: “We’re open to it if [the board] think it’s going to add value in some way… but we’re not actively pushing it.” He added: “Ultimately, it is the economics of the business that will dictate the outcome of the share price rather than simply where it is listed. After all, companies like BAE Systems (OTCMKTS: BAESY) and Babcock International (OTCMKTS: BCKIY) have had no trouble attracting interest to their shares over the last 12 months.” Five years ago, Pearson had a reputation as an academic textbook publisher plagued by profit warnings, but under Andy Bird and then Abbosh as chief executive, the company has transformed itself into a tech-savvy education firm. Pearson, whose biggest clients include universities and training businesses, has developed numerous generative AI-enabled technologies. These can help teachers improve their efficiency and students with their studies, for instance with AI tutors that can answer questions and set them quizzes. However, in recent months, Pearson has been among a large cohort of software developing companies that have seen their share prices hit by fears of AI disruption. Some investors fear that technology businesses such as Anthropic will be able to develop similar tools to Pearson and offer them at cheaper prices. Cevian declined to comment. A Pearson spokesperson said: “Pearson has a unique role at the intersection of education, skills, and workforce development with an increasing market opportunity for learning in the age of AI. As we deliver on our strategy, we engage in open and constructive dialogue with our shareholders.”

Read the article

2/19/2026

Cruising for Trouble: Activist Investor Elliott Chastises Norwegian Board for CEO Picks

The Daily Upside (02/19/26)

It’s anything but smooth sailing for Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE: NCLH) and its new CEO. The company, which has struggled recently to keep up with rivals like Royal Caribbean and Carnival, announced last week that former Subway Restaurants chief executive John Chidsey was taking over as CEO, effective immediately. Stocks fell more than 7% on Friday after the news, and that wasn’t the worst of it. On Tuesday, Elliott Investment Management, which says it now holds a stake of more than 10% in Norwegian Cruise Line, sent a letter to the company’s board arguing that directors have failed to fulfill their duties — most notably, selecting the right leadership. “In 2015, the Board appointed a CEO whose tenure was defined by wasteful spending, misguided strategy and a share-price decline of more than 50%,” Elliott said in the letter. “The board then saw fit to appoint this CEO’s protégé, whose poorly executed strategic pivots and repeated guidance misses drove further underperformance of more than 140% relative to Norwegian’s peers.” Chidsey was certainly not spared: “Last week, shareholders abruptly received the troubling news that the same board that oversaw all of this value destruction had selected one of its own long-tenured members, who lacks any executive experience in the cruise industry, to be the company’s next chief executive.” In a statement to The Daily Upside, Norwegian said Elliott’s letter was its first feedback to the board on strategy and progress. “We are committed to delivering durable, long-term value creation, which will be led by our recently appointed CEO, John Chidsey,” the company added. Its next earnings call is March 2, and Reuters reports that the deadline for new board nominees is March 13. Elliott, which declined to comment beyond its press release and letter, seems to think it can turn this ship around: The company proposed a variety of changes at Norwegian, including adding board members with relevant experience, reviewing the executive leadership team and developing a new business plan. Elliott Partner John Pike and Portfolio Manager Bobby Xu, who signed the letter, said that they see a path for the stock to hit $56 per share, a roughly 159% increase from Friday's close. (The shares surged 12% on Tuesday.) Norwegian isn’t the only travel company facing criticism from an investor. Starboard Value released a letter Tuesday that it sent to Tripadvisor (NASDAQ: TRIP), calling for a board shakeup and criticizing the site operator’s approach to generative AI. Starboard says it now has a 9% stake in Tripadvisor.

Read the article

2/17/2026

Investor Pressure Mounts: Shareholder Activism in Europe

Financier Worldwide (02/17/26)

Shareholder activism has become increasingly popular among investors seeking to influence corporate actions. It encompasses a range of strategies that, while never guaranteeing success, can exert meaningful pressure on management teams and boards to implement significant organizational and structural changes. Long established in the United States, shareholder activism is rapidly gaining momentum elsewhere. Across Europe, dissatisfied investors have in recent years launched a series of campaigns pressing companies for greater transparency, accountability and alignment with shareholder interests. “We have seen a clear uptick in robust activism across European markets,” says Arne Grimme, a partner at De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. “Italy, the UK and Germany have experienced a notable rise in public campaigns, while in the Netherlands most activism occurs behind the scenes, with public campaigns representing only a fraction of total activity.” “Activists frequently seek board representation,” he continues. “The rationale is straightforward: a board seat provides direct influence over the core issues in their campaigns, like strategy, capital allocation, shareholder returns, M&A and operational efficiency.” According to Diligent Market Intelligence's 'Corporate Governance in Europe 2025' report, the UK is currently the most active market in Europe for shareholder activism, having recorded a 44 percent year on year increase in the number of engaged companies. Between September 2024 and August 2025, 52 UK companies faced activist campaigns compared with 36 during the same period in 2024. This demonstrates a clear rise in shareholder engagement. The Diligent report also highlights that although smaller-cap companies made up nearly 70% of all UK activism, many large-cap campaigns were driven by prominent U.S. activists who are increasingly seeking value opportunities in the European market. Germany remains Europe's most contested activism landscape after the UK. During the first eight months of 2025, activists secured six board seats, an increase from four in 2024. Many of these campaigns centered on improving operational efficiency, reducing costs and pursuing consolidation strategies. Europe’s varied corporate governance regimes and differing board election mechanisms have significantly shaped these developments. Italy’s distinctive slate voting system has allowed activists to reshape boards quietly, with five seats gained during the first eight months of 2025, up from four in both 2023 and 2024. In France, public campaigns are still relatively uncommon, with only three launched during the first eight months of 2025. However, activists have become bolder and are increasingly prepared to escalate to public initiatives when private discussions fail to deliver results. Despite the growing openness to public-facing campaigns in France, European activists generally begin discreetly by approaching management, other shareholders and occasionally regulators behind closed doors. Campaigns that achieve traction tend to prioritize private engagement and focus on governance or operational improvements rather than solely financial issues. “Activism unfolds differently in Europe compared to the United States,” affirms Grimme. “In the Netherlands, for example, there are no proxy fights from day one and limited aggressive public campaigns. Activists first seek engagement with the chief executive and chairperson, then build on that relationship.” Establishing this engagement is not always straightforward. “Most Dutch companies have a governance structure allowing boards to make binding nominations for their own members, who must satisfy carefully drafted profile requirements,” explains Grimme. “We have seen activists attempt to influence these board profiles or individual role specifications instead.” Legal frameworks create further complications. Dutch law requires board members to act in the best interests of the company, taking into account all stakeholders. “There is no overriding obligation toward shareholders, a concept which U.S. activists in particular struggle to accept,” adds Grimme. “This framework makes it difficult for activists to get a seat at the table. The real threat in the Dutch context is mobilized shareholder support. Once a critical mass of shareholders turns against the company, the Dutch legal system offers boards no protection.” Following a temporary slowdown in activism during the final months of 2025 due to U.S. tariffs, so-called ‘watch and wait’ activists are expected to return in significant numbers. Their renewed interest is likely to be driven by market volatility, increased scrutiny of chief executive remuneration and a resurgence in public to private transactions. In its latest ‘European Activist Alert,’ Alvarez & Marsal (A&M) forecasts a renewed wave of activism across Europe in 2026. Germany is viewed as having substantial value creation opportunities that are expected to trigger a rise in campaigns, particularly within the industrial, technology and materials sectors. The UK is also expected to see a recovery in activist activity, with the consumer sector drawing particular interest. Switzerland is projected to attract growing activist attention, especially in the consumer, healthcare and technology industries. A&M additionally anticipates that France, Italy and Spain will experience increasing levels of activism, although from a lower starting point and at a more gradual pace. “We expect shareholder activism in Europe to remain prominent,” notes Grimme. “The trend toward constructive, behind the scenes engagement will likely continue, while the pressure on boards to deliver shareholder value will intensify.” As activism continues to evolve across Europe, companies will need to remain agile, transparent and responsive to investor expectations. Those that proactively engage with shareholders and address strategic concerns early are likely to be best positioned to withstand – and even benefit from – the growing momentum behind activist involvement.

Read the article

2/12/2026

Ancora Could See Multiple Ways to Win in Warner Bros. Fight

Bloomberg (02/12/26) Monks, Matthew

Ancora Holdings Group — the investor that jumped into the takeover fight for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (NASDAQ: WBD) Wednesday — has made a splash by showing up in high-profile M&A situations. The firm, whose activism arm is led by James Chadwick, played key roles in the mergers of United States Steel Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp. (NYSE: NSC), among others. Ancora unsuccessfully tried to scuttle US Steel's sale to Nippon Steel Corp. (OTCMKTS: NPSCY), while its winning push for management changes at Norfolk helped pave the way for the rail operator's mega-merger with Union Pacific Corp. (NYSE: UNP). Ancora, based in Cleveland, is urging Warner Bros. to reject Netflix Inc.'s (NASDAQ: NFLX) offer and reconsider a bid by Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ: PSKY), describing the Netflix offer as “inferior” while questioning the streaming giant's political pull. Regardless of whether Ancora succeeds, its Warner Bros. push shores up its reputation for making noise around some of the biggest names in corporate America make strategic moves. “In all of these situations we're looking for multiple ways to win,” Chadwick, president of Ancora's alternatives subsidiary, said at Bloomberg's activism conference last year. “We don't want to have one pathway to an exit or successful outcome. We're looking to design these in a way that there's multiple ways that this gets to a good outcome in the end.” The firm’s activist fund, Bellator, gained more than 17% in 2025, according to a person familiar with the matter who declined to be identified because the details aren’t public. A representative for Ancora wasn’t immediately available for comment. “Ancora has ascended to the top tier of activists over the past five years,” Lawrence Elbaum, M&A partner at Sullivan & Cromwell and co-head of the firm’s shareholder activism defense practice, said in a statement. “While one may think that’s because of its hard-fighting ways, a lot of the success has been driven by working with CEOs and directors behind the scenes. The firm has a lot of tools in its toolbox.” With about $11 billion in assets under management, Ancora started in 2003 as a registered investment adviser, or wealth advisory firm. Ancora Chief Executive Officer Fred DiSanto, looking to differentiate the firm by offering clients access to shareholder activism, recruited former Relational Investors executive Chadwick in 2014 lead the effort. It first started by targeting small companies such as Riverview Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ: RVSB) and DHI Group Inc. (NYSE: DHX). By 2022, Ancora had grown the hedge fund division, which houses its activist strategy, to about $1.2 billion. Having committed capital in hedge funds and the ability to raise special-purpose vehicles from its wealth-management base helped Ancora up its ambitions. In the early 2020s, the firm began targeting ever-bigger targets such as retailer Kohl’s Corp. (NYSE: KSS), packaging firm Berry Global and toy company Hasbro Inc. (NASDAQ: HAS). The firm’s breakout moment as a top-tier activist may have been its acrimonious campaign against Norfolk Southern, which ended in a partial victory as it placed three of its nominees on the board. Ancora had sought to win control of the board to force out Alan Shaw as chief executive officer. Chadwick burnished his reputation as an outspoken agitator at Norfolk Southern's 2024 annual meeting, when he called out passive institutional investors for their lack of support and said they would be culpable should the company have another deadly accident after the disastrous 2023 derailment in Ohio. Norfolk Southern fired Shaw in 2024 for a relationship with a colleague. With its Midwestern roots and ties to unions, Ancora initially tended to target old-line industries such as rail, industrials, manufacturing and packaging, though it has become more sector agnostic in recent years. It also has a particular interest on situations that touch its home market. “For us there’s somewhat connectivity to our own backyard where we live and where we work,” Chadwick said in an interview last year with CNBC. “Some of these stories we’re involved with when you talk about US Steel, obviously Cleveland has a long history in the steel industry, we have a lot of relationships in steel as well. So these things really hit home for us.”

Read the article

2/12/2026

Commentary: Toyota Gets a Stinging Buyout Bloody Nose

Reuters (02/12/26) Lockett, Hudson

Hudson Lockett, Asia Columnist for Reuters Breakingviews in Hong Kong, says, "Toyota has two options: take it on the chin now or risk a haymaker later. Insiders at the powerful industrial group have just received a stinging bloody nose in their battle to take Toyota Industries (6201.T) private for a lowball 5.65 trillion yen ($37 billion). The consortium that includes Toyota Motor (7203.T), its chair Akio Toyoda, and the family's unlisted Toyota Fudosan had to admit on Thursday that they had failed to convince independent shareholders in the forklift and car-parts maker to accept their woefully inadequate bid. So they're extending their tender offer a couple more weeks. That's unlikely to win over the many holdouts, leaving the consortium with the unpalatable choice of either raising the price substantially or dropping the deal and having Elliott Investment Management in their face for the foreseeable future. The wannabe buyers' announcement gives them time to raise the offer from its current 18,800 yen per share, despite asserting last month that they had “no intention” of doing so. But they also acknowledge that only 33% of outstanding shares have been tendered. Paul Singer’s Elliott, which owns a 7.1% stake in the target, says this equates to fewer than one in five independent shareholders tendering. That's a blow to the consortium’s assertion that the offer price “reflects the intrinsic value” of Industries. The activist on Friday repeated its call for investors not to tender shares and recommended that those few who already have to withdraw. With Industries shares jumping another 2% on Friday morning to their highest level since the deal’s announcement, the odds of Toyota convincing the other four-fifths to accept the current offer price look slim. The simplest path forward would be to raise their bid to meet Elliott’s stated valuation of 26,134 yen per share for the target. That would offer decent returns to motivate outside shareholders and provide some proof, should the activist press for more in court, that buyers ultimately engaged in good faith negotiation on the target’s valuation, albeit belatedly. This outcome is hardly ideal for Toyoda’s consortium, but the other option looks positively grueling: walk away from the deal and continue to grapple with the constant hassle of Elliott as Industries’ biggest external shareholder. In this scenario, the combative activist would probably press Industries to sell its cross-shareholdings with the rest of Toyota group and return the capital to all investors, rather than mostly to the insiders' consortium as envisaged in the buyout offer. That won't sit well with Toyota. However, the prospect of Elliott continually jabbing at Industries could yet provide impetus for an equitable deal before the new deadline."

Read the article

2/11/2026

Teradata Agrees to Board Changes With Lynrock Lake. The Stock Soars 22%.

Barron's (02/11/26) Wolf, Nate

Teradata (NYSE: TDC) is shaking up its board of directors as part of an agreement with investor Lynrock Lake. Wall Street seems to like the move. The board will appoint Melissa Fisher, previously the chief financial officer of Outreach.io, as a director by March 1, and will work with Lynrock Lake to identify another independent director to join the board later this year. Two current directors will retire over the next two years as part of the plan. Shares of Teradata, which makes a cloud database and data analytics platform, jumped 22% to $35.54 on Wednesday. Lynrock Lake filed a securities disclosure last March changing to the stance of an investor and announcing that it had amassed 9.4 million shares in Teradata—about 10% of the company. The investment firm viewed Teradata stock as undervalued and pushed for the hiring of a permanent chief financial officer. Teradata appointed John Ederer to that role two months later. Teradata shares have risen more than 45% over the last 12 months but remain well off their all-time closing high of $80.62 in September 2012. “We firmly believe in the long-term value potential of Teradata and look forward to Melissa’s contributions and further Board refreshment to advance the Company’s strategic initiatives and enhance value for all shareholders,” said Lynrock Lake CEO Cynthia Paul. As part of the agreement, Lynrock Lake will support the board’s full slate of directors at the company’s 2026 annual meeting, and also agreed to certain customary standstill provisions limiting further activist activity. The board shakeup came the same day Teradata breezed past earnings Wall Street’s expectations for the fourth quarter. The company posted adjusted earnings of 74 cents a share for the quarter, surpassing analysts’ estimates of 56 cents. Revenue was $421 million, up 3% from last year and above Wall Street’s call for $400.5 million. Teradata expects annual recurring revenue, or ARR, growth of 2% to 4% in 2026 and adjusted earnings of $2.60 a share at the midpoint. Analysts were looking for ARR growth of around 1% and adjusted earnings of $2.54 a share. The ARR forecast was the “biggest positive” of the earnings report, said UBS analyst Radi Sultan, who argued the company could exceed that 2% to 4% range. UBS reiterated a Neutral rating on the stock but bumped its price target to $36 from $23. Competition from more modern data vendors, such as Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW), Databricks, and Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR), is keeping UBS (NYSE: UBS) on the sidelines. “While these results are encouraging we have yet to pickup any major changes in the competitive outlook,” wrote Sultan.

Read the article